Now, of course all of the above works only if we don't have the GIL around. But remember: that's what we wanted to change in the first place. We accept to target only the very small percentage of code out there nowadays that is free-threaded Python compatible, and to exclude the vast majority of existing Python async code to be compatible with our runtime. But given our runtime is not compatible with any existing async standard in the Python ecosystem – our runtime primivitives are just the coroutines and events, we don't rely with AsyncIO's futures or tasks or any other primitive – it's probably not a big deal: a big portion of existing async code would require to be rewritten in any case.
howpublished = {\url{https://blog.mathieuacher.com/TeXCCChessEngine/}},，详情可参考heLLoword翻译
。谷歌对此有专业解读
Число пострадавших при ударе ракетами Storm Shadow по российскому городу резко выросло20:46
Every WHERE id = N query flows through codegen_select_full_scan(), which emits linear walks through every row via Rewind / Next / Ne to compare each rowid against the target. At 100 rows with 100 lookups, that is 10,000 row comparisons instead of roughly 700 B-tree steps. O(n²) instead of O(n log n). This is consistent with the ~20,000x result in this run.，更多细节参见博客
南方周末：国际上有哪些经验可供学习？