During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Раскрыты подробности о договорных матчах в российском футболе18:01
。safew官方版本下载对此有专业解读
Цены на нефть взлетели до максимума за полгода17:55
记者：当前，全球减贫进程面临诸多不确定性和挑战。在减贫和乡村振兴方面，我国有哪些可以与其他发展中国家分享的理念和实践经验？
，详情可参考heLLoword翻译官方下载
三星 Galaxy S26，仅提供 12GB + 256GB 版本，售价为 6999 元
“省市县乡领导班子将陆续换届，强调政绩观也很有针对性。”在开局之年的“第一课”上，习近平总书记道出了树立和践行正确政绩观的另一层深远考量。。关于这个话题，下载安装 谷歌浏览器 开启极速安全的 上网之旅。提供了深入分析